摩天大楼“瀑布” | Kuzenkov Kirill | 2022 | 美国

摩天大楼“瀑布” | Kuzenkov Kirill | 2022 | 美国

SKYSCRAPER «WaTerFall» Conceptual project_______________________________________Architect & Visualizer: Kuzenkov Kirill_______________________________________From the idea of a skyscraper to the finished image, the work took only 3 days. Ignoring common sense and typical solutions, I tried to find an interesting form of skyscraper. I decided on three towers leaning on each other and forming a common top. The shape of the skyscraper allows to put it in rather unusual situations. The building can be used at a sharp drop in height location  - in the lower part of the skyscraper is based on two towers, and the top rests on one (as on the rendering). In addition to this unusual configuration, a skyscraper can have three equal towers for location on a flat surface. Even so, the skyscraper could be placed over landmark objects or crossroads.

I'm sure the constructions of skyscraper contains inaccuracies and engineering errors. However, on a conceptual level I see it as a combination of the exposed exoskeleton of mesh structure and the load-bearing stiffening core in each tower. As the towers occupy small dimensions in plan (approximately 15 × 26 m) this does not allow for many elevators to be installed. I decided to divide the functional building in such a way as to reduce the density of people and consequently reduce the number of elevators. It is impossible to use elevators in the load-bearing cores of the tower across the entire height, because above the 35th floor they would cross the envelope of the building. For this reason, elevator shafts have been provided in the central area from the Sky lobby to the top floor (35-45 floors).Up to the 22nd floor, the interior surface of the towers has a flat vertical plane to which the elevators adjoin. This can be used as an advantage and make the elevators in this area with transparent cabins. In the context of visualization, it will open the view of the elevators to the waterfall

P.s. I don't know what to do better. I have one uncommercial ambitious architectural project that I estimate needs more than six months of work, and with commercial projects, I'm afraid I won't finish it at all However, such an ongoing project does not require much time and the result can be obtained very quickly. Question for discussion, please answer in the comments: is it better to complete a large project in high detail, or more often to publish similar mini-projects with low detail and a minimum number of angles? P.s.s. (for clients)I am on the lookout for an opportunity to increase my practical skills in visualization and conceptual design of architectural objects. Therefore, I am open to interesting job offers, including the possibility of moving and working on stable diffusion

• 转载自：behance
• 作者：原文作者
• 图片@原文作者
• 语言：英语
• 编辑：序赞网
• 阅读原文
  

哈哈哈，首先感谢楼主辛苦的整理和热心的分享；也感谢评论里的复制评论逗笑了我~我以前看帖基本不回帖，后来我发现，这样不但会花掉我的金币，而且不厚道。于是我把这段文字保存在记事本里，每看一个帖子，就复制上去，以表达我对楼主的谢意，把帖子顶起来，顺便帮自己挣点金钱。学习中，谢谢

感谢楼主辛苦分享